Close
In this month's issue:
Reforms are underway to streamline pathways to specialist registration and help ease Australia’s medical workforce pressures. The specialist registration standard is a key lever for reforms and the revised specialist registration standard is open for comment. Governments have set ambitious timelines for these reforms. If you’re interested, please join our public consultation and share your thoughts by 3 July.
Dr Anne Tonkin AO Chair, Medical Board of Australia
Tell us what you think about proposed regulatory changes designed to unlock reforms to get more internationally qualified medical specialists practising safely in Australia.
The Board has launched a consultation on a draft revised Registration standard for specialist registration.
Consultation timelines are compressed to meet reform deadlines set by Australia’s health ministers, so please share your feedback by 3 July 2024.
The registration standard is the regulatory tool that paves the way for the reforms, which include a fast-track pathway to specialist registration that aims to get more internationally qualified medical specialists seeing patients in Australia more quickly.
The fast-track pathway uses an existing provision in the National Law and will sit alongside the existing specialist medical college assessment system, which will remain in place for SIMGs who are not eligible for the expedited pathway.
The expedited pathway will recognise specific overseas specialist medical qualifications and grant upfront specialist registration to eligible doctors. Initial conditions on their registration will be imposed as a safeguard to protect patients while the new recruits are inducted into Australia’s healthcare system.
GPs, anaesthetists, obstetricians and gynaecologists, and psychiatrists are the priority specialties, with the fast-track pathway targeted to start in October 2024 for GPs and December 2024 for other priority medical specialties.
Proposed changes to the registration standard aim to maintain standards while making the pathways to specialist registration clearer, establishing the expedited pathway, removing outdated regulatory barriers and improving workforce flexibility.
Setting up the fast-track pathway is a key component in work by the Board and Ahpra to implement relevant recommendations flowing from the Overseas Health Practitioner Regulatory Settings Review - Final Report, 2023 by Ms Robyn Kruk AO (the Kruk Review).
Ahpra and the Board have set up a taskforce to develop the new expedited pathway and the Board is consulting with the specialist colleges for the priority medical specialities to finalise the list of qualifications that will be the gateway to fast-track registration.
We encourage all agencies and individuals involved in recruiting and employing SIMGs to take part in the consultation.
The consultation paper supporting the draft revised Registration standard for specialist registration is published on the Board’s consultation page.
We are concerned about practitioners practising in health services designed to provide customers with access to a predetermined medicine, which raises concerns that some may be putting profit ahead of patient welfare.
This statement reminds practitioners about their existing obligations and highlights how these responsibilities apply in the context of new models of care.
New models of healthcare, including the use of telehealth are important enablers of greater access to health services. Our concern is that some new models of care may take advantage of consumer demand for certain treatments and compromise good patient care.
It doesn’t matter what model of care is used to prescribe or dispense. The health practitioner prescribing or dispensing medicines remains responsible to deliver safe and appropriate care and for ensuring that their own practice meets the standard expected by their registration board and the community.
We urge health practitioners to think carefully before practising in any business, whether that be via a technology platform or in-person, that may not reflect the professional obligations in their respective codes of conduct.
Some emerging health service models that are disrupting the traditional therapeutic relationship between a patient and their practitioner have enabled the rapid rise in the prescription and use of specific medicines or products. Examples include businesses focusing on treatment for obesity, chronic pain and sleep disorders. Some of these models are focused on delivering a single treatment solely in response to patient demand. They often have a high volume of telemedicine consultations and/or computer or algorithm-based prescribing of medicines, and some businesses also offer direct supply of unapproved medicines to patients.
It is of concern that in some circumstances, practitioners delivering health services within these models of healthcare may be failing to meet the standards of good practice, with risks to patient safety that have the potential to cause significant harm.
These models present challenges to health practitioners including:
The Medical, Nursing and Midwifery and Pharmacy Boards of Australia and Ahpra are also aware of reports of potentially vulnerable practitioners, particularly inexperienced or early career practitioners, who are being misled that their practice is acceptable when it is not.
We urge health practitioners working in businesses with any of these problematic features to ensure that the framework for practice is consistent with their professional obligations.
Regardless of what model of care they use to prescribe or dispense, all health practitioners should be prepared to be able to explain to their Board how their practice meets their professional obligations to provide safe and appropriate health care.
You need a CPD home to log your 2024 CPD.
As we said in our email to all doctors last month, time is running out if you don’t yet have a CPD home.
There are 20 AMC-accredited CPD homes, including all specialist medical colleges and four non-college homes.
If you are doing a specialist college CPD program or have already joined one of the other AMC-accredited CPD homes and are doing CPD, you can ignore this reminder.
The list of CPD homes is published on the Medical Board's website – choose one that suits your scope of practice.
And to answer your questions about CPD:
CPD exemptions:
In case it helps, our recent email included a checklist for your 2024 CPD. See What do I need to do? on our website.
All CPD homes will report on whether or not you complied with CPD requirements to the Board each year. You also have to make a declaration about CPD when you renew your medical registration.
The Board regularly receives notifications related to medical practitioners providing medical care to family members and to those close to them. We have received feedback, particularly from some older practitioners, that they have always done this and cannot see why it is a problem. However, treating family and those close to you is not considered good practice and is fraught with problems.
The Board’s code of conduct, Good medical practice: a code of conduct for doctors in Australia, sets out clear professional standards:
Whenever possible, doctors should avoid providing care to anyone with whom they have a close personal relationship (and) must not prescribe Schedule 8, psychotropic medication and/or drugs of dependence or perform elective surgery, such as cosmetic surgery, on anyone with whom they have a close personal relationship.
Here are some recent examples of treating family members:
In a recent case, a tribunal noted the risk of poor medical outcomes due to bias in treatment and investigation, and the practitioner being influenced by factors other than medical facts.
Tribunals have heard cases involving doctors providing medical care to their family and friends when it was not an emergency, and the patient could have accessed care from an independent practitioner.
There are risks when medical care does not include the usual checks, for example, when a comprehensive history is not taken or a physical assessment is not performed. Ad hoc prescriptions are often not documented or monitored, and continuity of care is missed.
Medical practitioners should not be their family member’s primary practitioner, must never prescribe Schedule 8 medications to family and should avoid treating family members except in an emergency.
Of course, doctors are free to advocate for and support family members with their healthcare needs.
The Board publishes data each quarter on the medical profession. Data are broken down by state and territory and registration type, and for specialists by specialty and field of specialty practice. Visit our Statistics page to view the latest report.
This is the first article in a series of three on myths and misconceptions about notifications.
Too often, doctors struggle in silence when they are dealing with a physical health, mental health or drug and alcohol issue – or even just the day-to-day challenges of being a medical practitioner.
The best thing you can do – for yourself, for your family, and for your patients – is to seek help early and to actively engage in recommended treatments. This might be from your own GP, another health practitioner or from one of the independent support services available for medical practitioners that are funded by the Board via Drs4Drs.
There is a common misconception that if you seek help, your treating practitioner will automatically be required to report it to Ahpra and your registration may be affected. This is not the case.
The threshold for when treating practitioners need to make a mandatory notification about health is very high and only necessary when the public is at substantial risk of harm. The need for a mandatory notification to be made is not often met.
If you are managing your health and getting the help you need, you can usually continue to practise. The Board wants you to be healthy and safe to practise and encourages you to seek help early when you need support.
Recent changes to the National Law have now been enacted in WA. The changes include protecting the title ‘surgeon’ and allowing Ahpra and the Board to issue a statement warning the public about individual practitioners, when there is a serious, unmanaged risk to public health and safety.
The Act brings Western Australia into greater alignment with the other states and territories.
There is more detail in the news item on the Ahpra website.
There are important lessons in tribunal decisions about registered medical practitioners. The Medical Board of Australia refers the most serious concerns about medical practitioners to tribunals in each state and territory. Here are recently published decisions:
Ahpra, on behalf of the 15 National Boards, publishes a record of panel, court and tribunal decisions about registered health practitioners.
When investigating a notification, the Medical Board may refer a medical practitioner to a health panel hearing, or a performance and professional standards panel hearing. Under the National Law, panel hearings are not open to the public. Ahpra publishes a record of panel hearing decisions made since July 2010. Practitioners’ names are not published, consistent with the National Law.
Summaries of tribunal and court cases are published on the Court and tribunal decisions page of the Ahpra website. The Board and Ahpra sometimes choose not to publish summaries, for example about cases involving practitioners with impairment.
In New South Wales and Queensland, different arrangements are in place. More information is available on Ahpra’s website on the How to raise a concern about a health practitioner page.
The Medical Board of Australia and Ahpra can be contacted by phone on 1300 419 495.
For more information, see the Medical Board of Australia website and the Ahpra website.
Lodge an enquiry form through the website under Contact us at the bottom of every web page.
Mail correspondence can be addressed to: Dr Anne Tonkin AO, Chair, Medical Board of Australia, GPO Box 9958, Melbourne, VIC 3001.
Please note: Practitioners are responsible for keeping up to date with the Board’s expectations about their professional obligations. The Board publishes standards, codes and guidelines as well as alerts in its newsletter. If you unsubscribe from this newsletter you are still required to keep up to date with information published on the Board’s website.
Comments on the Board newsletter are welcome, send your feedback and suggestions to newsletters@ahpra.gov.au.
For registration enquiries or contact detail changes, call the Ahpra customer service team on 1300 419 495 (from within Australia).