Close
In this month's issue:
Engagement with life-long learning is embedded in the culture of medicine. It’s how we reassure ourselves that we’re keeping our knowledge and skills up to date. It’s how we can be confident we’re giving our patients the best care. And it’s how we can stay intellectually engaged with our peers and our profession. We’ve made some changes to continuing professional development (CPD). You can check if there’s anything you need to do to comply with our updated CPD registration standard.
Dr Anne Tonkin AO Chair, Medical Board of Australia
Continuing professional development (CPD) is changing and all doctors will need an Australian Medical Council (AMC) accredited CPD home for their 2024 CPD (unless they are exempt from doing CPD).
All specialist medical colleges are already AMC-accredited CPD homes and there are four other AMC-accredited CPD homes:
If you’re already doing your CPD through a college or another AMC-accredited CPD home, you already comply with updated CPD requirements and don’t need to do anything else.
If you don’t have a CPD home, before you start next year’s CPD, you will need to find a CPD home and write a plan for the CPD you will do in 2024. You’ll need to tell the Board the name of your CPD home when you renew your registration in 2024.
More information about CPD requirements is on the Medical Board’s CPD page.
A list of accredited CPD homes is available on the Medical Board’s CPD homes page. New homes will be added to this list as they are accredited.
In case anyone missed the message – new telehealth guidelines say no to asynchronous prescribing.
The updated Guidelines: Telehealth consultations with patients took effect on 1 September 2023.
Doctors who continue to promote prescribing without consultations may be putting themselves at risk of regulatory action.
Providing healthcare (including prescribing, issuing certificates and referring) via questionnaire-based asynchronous web-based tools in the absence of a real-time patient–doctor consultation is not good practice.
The telehealth guidelines clearly state that prescribing without a real-time doctor–patient consultation for each request (whether in person, by video or telephone) is not good practice and is not supported by the Board.
Any doctor who does not meet the standard set out in the Board’s code of conduct and the telehealth guidelines must be ready to explain how their management of the patient was appropriate and necessary in the circumstances.
All the detail is in the Guidelines: Telehealth consultations with patients.
The number of practitioners went up and the number of complaints about doctors went down in 2022/23, according to the latest annual report of Ahpra and the national health practitioner boards, now published.
The annual report is a comprehensive record of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for the 12 months to 30 June 2023.
The Medical Board had a particularly busy year. Much of our work was high profile and contentious, but we held our focus on public safety. Key achievements include reform of the cosmetic surgery industry and strengthening telehealth guidelines. Workforce issues have emerged as a significant, ongoing challenge.
A medicine-specific snapshot and data tables are also published.
Highlights include:
The 2022/23 annual report is available on Ahpra’s website and a medicine-specific snapshot and data tables are available on the Medical Board website.
The Board has approved the following:
The Board publishes data each quarter on the medical profession. Data are broken down by state and territory and registration type, and for specialists by specialty and field of specialty practice. Visit our Statistics page to view the latest report.
Advertising and social media are tightly linked with patient demand for non-surgical cosmetic procedures. We’re keen to hear what you think about possible new rules to increase patient safety, promote informed consent and reduce risk.
Ahpra and the National Boards are consulting on three documents for health practitioners who perform and advertise non-surgical cosmetic procedures:
The draft shared advertising guidelines will apply to anyone advertising non-surgical cosmetic procedures, including medical practitioners, nurses and dentists. Much like the Medical Board’s new cosmetic surgery advertising guidelines – now in place – these advertising guidelines include guidance around issues such as before and after images, claims about expertise and qualifications, and the ban on the use of testimonials. The use of social media influencers is also a focus.
The draft practice guidelines are for health practitioners (other than doctors) performing non-surgical cosmetic procedures – this includes nurses and dentists. These practice guidelines will not apply to doctors, who are already working to new Medical Board cosmetic practice guidelines that came into effect on 1 July 2023. But if you’re interested, we’re keen for feedback from doctors on the guidelines for other registered health practitioners, particularly if you work in cosmetics with other health practitioners.
The consultation is open for 10 weeks and closes on 2 February 2024.
Learn more about the consultation and how you can have your say on the Medical Board consultation page.
Please share your feedback about whether rural generalist medicine should be recognised as a new field of specialty practice within general practice.
Submissions are welcome until 12 December 2023 on a joint application from the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine and the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners to expand the list of recognised specialties to include rural generalist medicine.
The currently approved List of specialties, fields of specialty practice and related specialist titles in medicine is published on our website.
Your feedback and advice from the Australian Medical Council, the Board’s accreditation authority, will inform the Board’s recommendation to health ministers.
The consultation paper is available on the Board’s Current consultations page.
It’s a big challenge to reframe a complaint made about you into constructive feedback. But when managed well, complaints can lead to improvements that increase patient and community confidence in you as a doctor. Effective and timely local management can also help prevent a concern escalating to an external complaint body or regulator.
We’ve developed a new Checklist for practitioners handling feedback and complaints. It’s designed to help you when a patient raises their concern with you directly or with the health service where you work.
Because it can be confronting and stressful to receive negative feedback or a complaint, we’ve also published a list of general support services and practitioner support services available to medical practitioners.
We hope the checklist is helpful if a patient raises their concern with you or your practice staff directly. It might also be relevant if you have a role in establishing and maintaining complaints systems and processes at a health service.
Ahpra and the National Boards partnered with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, in a joint project, to develop the checklist and other resources to support consumers to navigate the various complaints options available.
The checklist and other resources are available on Ahpra’s Resources page.
The Royal Australasian College of Medical Administrators (RACMA) has extended its clinical governance survey. Those who responded provided a range of disturbing insights into clinical governance, however the response rate has been too low to extrapolate the findings. Medical practitioners working in hospitals are invited to provide their views to help determine the current maturity of clinical governance across Australasian health services.
Doctors from all types and sizes of hospitals can participate (acute through to community, public and private). The survey is anonymous with an option to identify your hospital. Results will help inform opportunities to enhance medical practitioner involvement in quality and safety.
The survey will take about eight minutes and can be accessed via the Clinical governance maturity survey link. It has been extended to 5 December 2023. For enquiries contact clinicalgovernance@racma.edu.au.
There are important lessons in tribunal decisions about registered medical practitioners. The Medical Board of Australia refers the most serious concerns about medical practitioners to tribunals in each state and territory. Here are recently published decisions:
Ahpra, on behalf of the 15 National Boards, publishes a record of panel, court and tribunal decisions about registered health practitioners.
When investigating a notification, the Board may refer a medical practitioner to a health panel hearing, or a performance and professional standards panel hearing. Under the National Law, panel hearings are not open to the public. Ahpra publishes a record of panel hearing decisions made since July 2010. Practitioners’ names are not published, consistent with the National Law.
Summaries of tribunal and court cases are published on the Court and tribunal decisions page of the Ahpra website. The Board and Ahpra sometimes choose not to publish summaries, for example about cases involving practitioners with impairment.
In New South Wales and Queensland, different arrangements are in place. More information is available on Ahpra’s website on the Concerned about a health practitioner? page.
Please note: Practitioners are responsible for keeping up to date with the Board’s expectations about their professional obligations. The Board publishes standards, codes and guidelines as well as alerts in its newsletter. If you unsubscribe from this newsletter you are still required to keep up to date with information published on the Board’s website. Comments on the Board newsletter are welcome, send your feedback and suggestions to newsletters@ahpra.gov.au. For registration enquiries or contact detail changes, call the Ahpra customer service team on 1300 419 495 (from within Australia).